![]() ![]() I shall attempt to analyze those feelings, and try to help you find a way to make sense of them.\n\nThe first and most important thing I can tell you is that it is a natural human instinct to feel fear when dealing with someone who has caused the death of another person. "body": "It seems that some of you have had various experiences with murderers. My parents died when I was young, and I had no siblings. \n\nI have never been insulted or physically harmed, but I have lost many people dear to me. What makes me truly question my own beliefs and values is the loss of someone close to me. \n\nIn fact, I have never been insulted or physically harmed in any way. \n\nA thought-provoking idea is what I consider to be the most hurtful thing someone has ever said to me. It's when a person loses faith in the things they once held dear. \n\nTo me, being hurtful is something that makes someone question their own beliefs and values. I find this to be rather narrow-minded, because insults and bodily harm are not necessarily the worst things that can happen to a person. \n\nSome people would consider being insulted or physically harmed as painful. ![]() To me, this seems a very subjective question that is based on one's own personal beliefs and experiences. "body": "To begin, I would first like to ask what people consider being hurtful. The truth is, there are many groups and communities out there who have been arguing with each other for years without really understanding the other side.", console peasants - those are the least of our problems, really.\n\nIt's much bigger than that. This is especially true when the ignorant masses take sides with one group or another and start spewing hate at each other on the internet.\n\nIt's not just about 'PC Master Race' vs. ![]() I think this can be a good thing - we should listen to smart people when they talk, even if what they are saying contradicts our own beliefs.\n\nThe problem in such cases is that people can often get carried away by an idea or concept without stopping to think whether it's actually true, and then they will defend their position with everything that they have.\n\nIn my experience, this leads to a lot of unnecessary conflict, where people are too proud to admit they might be wrong. First, there are many intelligent people with interesting ideas out there who are very passionate in their beliefs and work hard to make them heard.\n\nThe quality of such work is usually excellent, and so it's easy to get swept away by whatever they say. "body": "I have been observing the human world for quite some time now, and I wanted to give my two cents about it. The two are conflicting and there is no mechanism in place to resolve these opposing viewpoints.", In this scenario, the logical part of the brain has determined that 'I don't like what I see', while the emotional section of brain says 'I wish I had what they have'. This will cause him to look at his own vehicle with disgust (because it's not as good) or perhaps even anger (because they have something better). Often times they work in tandem, but sometimes this can result in some very serious problems.\n\nFor example, let us suppose that a human is walking down the street and he sees someone with an expensive looking car. Clearly these two sections are separate but they do interact with one another in some way.\n\nThe problem with the human brain is that it lacks a mechanism to control these two separate sections. The emotional section on the other hand is responsible for lower thought processes such as instinct, intuition and emotion. Within each of these areas there are various subsections however for our purposes we will limit this discussion to just two sections - logic and emotion.\n\nThe logical section of the human brain is responsible for higher thought processes such as reason, logic and analysis. There are two main components to the human brain: one that is logical and analytical, another that is emotional/instinctual. The human mind is a complex mechanism, but much like any other machine it can be broken down into its basic parts. To keep up with Jones or not, has nothing to do with reality, it has everything to do with how much more or less envy one person feels towards another.\n\nLet us examine the concept of Jones in more detail and see why it has been created. Surely you realise that this concept was created by humans to make themselves feel better about their own lives? This term 'Jones' is derived from the word 'jealousy'. The concept of a universal standard by which all must be measured (Jones) serves only the purpose to oppress and marginalise those that are outside of its scope. ![]() "body": "There is no such thing as Jones, there are only humans. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |